首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation of the NPARC code for nozzle afterbody flows at transonic speeds
【2h】

Validation of the NPARC code for nozzle afterbody flows at transonic speeds

机译:验证以超音速流动的喷嘴后体的NPARC代码

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The NPARC code, a Reynolds-averaged full Navier-Stokes code, was validated for nozzle afterbody (boatail) flow fields at transonic speeds. The flow fields about three geometries were studied: an axisymmetric nozzle with attached flow; an axisymmetric nozzle with separated flow: and a two-dimensional (rectangular) nozzle with separated flow. Three turbulence models, Baldwin-Lomax, Baldwin-Barth, and Chien k-epsilon, were used to determine the effect of turbulence model selection on the flow field solution. Static pressure distributions on the nozzle surfaces and pitot pressure measurements in the exhaust plume were examined. Results from the NPARC code compared very well with experimental data for all cases. For attached flow fields, the effect of the turbulence models showed no discernable differences. The Baldwin-Barth model yielded better results than either the Chien k-epsilon or the Baldwin-Lomax model for separated flow fields.
机译:NPARC代码是雷诺平均的完整Navier-Stokes代码,已针对跨音速下的喷嘴后体(舟)流场进行了验证。研究了关于三种几何形状的流场:带有附加流的轴对称喷嘴;分离流动的轴对称喷嘴:和分离流动的二维(矩形)喷嘴。三种湍流模型Baldwin-Lomax,Baldwin-Barth和Chien k-epsilon用于确定湍流模型选择对流场解的影响。检查喷嘴表面的静压分布和排气羽流中的皮托管压力测量值。 NPARC代码的结果与所有情况下的实验数据都非常好。对于附加的流场,湍流模型的影响没有明显区别。对于分离的流场,鲍德温-巴思模型产生的结果优于Chien k-epsilon或鲍德温-Lomax模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号